Of Oral Evidence MCQ Quiz in తెలుగు - Objective Question with Answer for Of Oral Evidence - ముఫ్త్ [PDF] డౌన్‌లోడ్ కరెన్

Explanation- Section 59 of the Indian evidence act clearly points out that all facts except the contents of document of electronic records may be proved by oral evidence. So, the statement C stands incorrect.

Explanation- Here in statement A and B both are the direct evidence and no statement here amounts to hearsay evidence. According to section 59 of the Indian evidence act whenever oral evidences are given they must be direct not hearsay. 

The correct answer is

Key Points​CHAPTER IV: OF ORAL EVIDENCE

Section 59: Proof of facts by oral evidence – Every fact, besides those contained within documents or electronic records, is subject to be proven through oral testimony.

• Regarding facts that could be observed, the testimony must come from a witness who attests to having seen them.
• For facts that could be heard, the testimony must be from a witness who declares they heard them.
• If the fact could be detected through any other sense or in any different way, the testimony must come from a witness who experienced it through that particular sense or method.
• If the evidence concerns an opinion, or the rationale behind that opinion, it must be provided by the individual who has that opinion based on those specific reasons.
• It is permitted, however, to introduce the opinions of experts found in widely available treatises, along with the reasons for these opinions, by presenting such treatises in situations where the author has passed away, is unreachable, has become incapable of testifying, or if calling them as a witness entails unreasonable delays or costs, in the view of the Court.
• Additionally, if the oral evidence pertains to the existence or state of any physical object apart from a document, the Court is allowed, at its discretion, to request the submission of that object for its examination.