The statement below is followed by two arguments labelled I and II. Read the arguments in relation with the statement and identify the strong argument. Assume that all information in the given statements is true.

Statement: Children under the age of 12 years should not be allowed to use mobile phones.

Argument I: Mobile phones are expensive and all children cannot afford them.

Argument II: By using mobile phones, children under 12 years can get exposed to harmful radiation.  

The logic followed here is:

Statement: Children under the age of 12 years should not be allowed to use mobile phones.

Argument I: Mobile phones are expensive and all children cannot afford them.

Argument II: By using mobile phones, children under 12 years can get exposed to harmful radiation.

Analysis:

Argument I focuses on the financial aspect, stating that mobile phones are expensive and not all children can afford them. While this is a valid point, it is not directly related to the harm caused by mobile phones themselves, which is the primary concern in the statement.

Argument II discusses the potential exposure to harmful radiation, which is a valid health concern when it comes to children using mobile phones. This directly supports the statement, as the harm caused by radiation is a strong reason to restrict mobile phone use among young children.

Thus, the strong argument is Argument II because it directly addresses the negative effects of mobile phone usage on children, which aligns with the statement about restricting mobile phone use for children under 12 years.

Hence, the correct answer is "Option 2"