Who criticised naive pluralism in media politics relating to diversity ?

The correct answer is - K. Karppinen

Key Points

• Naive pluralism
  • Naive pluralism assumes that the media landscape inherently provides diverse viewpoints without considering structural inequalities or power imbalances.
  • This perspective is criticized for being overly simplistic and ignoring the role of economic and political influences in shaping media content.
• K. Karppinen
  • K. Karppinen is a scholar known for examining the limitations of naive pluralism in media politics.
  • He argues that pluralism in media does not automatically ensure equal representation or diversity, as it often overlooks systemic barriers to access and participation.
  • Karppinen emphasizes the need to address power structures to achieve genuine media diversity.

Additional Information

• Media pluralism
  • Refers to the presence of a variety of media sources and viewpoints in a democratic society.
  • It is often linked to the idea of ensuring freedom of expression and public access to diverse information.
  • However, structural issues like media ownership concentration can limit pluralism.
• Criticism of naive pluralism
  • Scholars argue that naive pluralism ignores the impact of corporate interests and political agendas on media diversity.
  • It assumes that the free market alone will foster diversity, which is often not the case due to economic monopolies.
  • As a result, marginalized groups may struggle to have their voices represented in mainstream media.
• Role of regulation
  • To counteract the limitations of naive pluralism, many advocate for media regulations that promote diversity and inclusivity.
  • Examples include public service broadcasting mandates and policies to limit media ownership concentration.